The Law of Consecration – Then and Now


As I return to D&C 42, I am struck that the part about the “law of consecration” seems to be simply a direction on how to remember the poor – which is not exactly a new commandment! The process outlined in D&C 42 seems to me to be a smoothing off of our rough edges as a people so we can see clearly that we don’t need all we have and can let go of it. The directions elsewhere in scripture – I’m thinking of Jacob’s speech to the Nephites in Jacob 2 right now – also say the same things. Seek first to bless the poor. Use what you gain to take care of them. These are not new ideas!! We have in D&C 42 a specific way in which the Lord wanted his people to maneuver this exchange of property etc at that particular time, but the commandment is a general command throughout scripture. In the law of Moses, you had to leave some of the grain in the field for the poor and for the animals. It was the law! This is nothing new really, it’s just that the mechanics of it are specific here in section 42.

Which is why, I think, that we can have this law of consecration still for us right now but with other specific directions. Just because we don’t have fields and fruit to leave for poor passerbys, doesn’t mean we don’t have to take care of the poor! Just because we don’t have a city of Zion doesn’t mean we can’t find people to help, all around us! Or as our direction of consecration goes – which I won’t quote directly – just because we are in the year 2010 doesn’t mean we don’t have a church to build up, with our talents, means, and time to give to callings and so forth. The methods may have changed, but the command to use what we have to bless others has never changed. That is what I’m most struck with today as I read D&C 42.

Advertisements

4 responses to “The Law of Consecration – Then and Now

  • Roberta

    I often wonder how to “marry” the commandment to take care of the poor, widows and orphans with the direction I hear from the church that “life is about struggle.” In my mind, I want to help remove the struggle that I see another experience, I want to help almost to the point of taking it over and making it better, but I don’t see the church doing this. The church offers support and encouragement and points the individual in the direction that the person should go to help themselves, but it usually don’t work to remove the struggle. Is this what the commandment means?

  • Roberta

    last sentence should read …it’ usually doesn’t work to remove…

  • Karen

    hmm… not sure how to answer that one very well… in part, because in the revelation of D&C 42 the Bishop helped decide so it wasn’t up to us to decide how far to intercede. Also, though, our direction has a lot less to do with money but with other ways we build the kingdom. I think the point is our complete giving over of ourselves to God, and he decides what to do about it? Although, I suppose it wouldn’t say “Remember the poor” if that were all it was saying.. hmm… I guess it comes back to praying about it? As you can see I don’t have an answer. 🙂

  • Roberta

    I agree! There’s so much more to the equation in D&C 42 than just money (not that all I see is the financial aspects) but you got me thinking…as usual. I hope I come across as inquisitive rather than argumentative. I certainly have the kindest of motives!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: