- The words “oath” and “covenant” from D&C 84:39 are clearly drawn from Hebrews, as any one in Joseph’s time would have recognized.
- Note that God made oath and covenant, that it’s His (D&C 84:40). Not actually a covenant we make with God! This is one sided when it is made, and then we are told/asked to receive it.
- D&C 132:22-25 are very worth looking at, as well as JST Genesis 14!
- The language of confirmed is related to oaths and covenants in Bible.
- Where else does “oath and covenant” come up together, as a phrase? In the Book of Mormon! But it always means oaths and covenants of robbers, bad secret society. Is the priesthood meant to be thought of as the “good” secret society? The one that counters the bad?
- The consequence for breaking an oath or covenant in a bad secret society is usually death! Severe consequence. D&C 84:41 is also severe.
- Interesting that it’s not about this life, as D&C 132 talks about (hard time this life, ok in next)
- The good secret society. It is a fundamental change in how we relate to other people. [Tangent here about how even when we as Latter-day Saints don’t understand all that this gospel is or how deep and wonderful the covenants are, there is still a change in how we relate to others. There are all sorts of “fringe benefits”that come even from the watered-down version of things. And the real vision is still buried in there, still being carried along by the church members even though we don’t realize it.
- Now, some notes/thoughts from what Don shared with us:
- “According to” usually means we’re referring to something just talked about, or to something clearly established. This “accords” with that previous thing.
- This seems to accord with Hebrews, which refers back to Psalms
- But also, look at Gen 14 “order of the covenant” also “oath by himself”
- JST Hebrews was worked on only 7 months earlier, and Joseph had just gone back through it about this time. So not only would the audience have thought about Hebrews, Joseph was thinking about Hebrews a lot during this time
- Some sort of “everlasting covenant” talked about in stories of David and others but Hebrews might be only place in NT (Heb 13:20).
- The JST of Hebrews 9 changes testament to covenant
- JST Hebrews 7:19 adds “without an oath” Law was administered without an oath
- JST Deut 10:2 adds “save words of everlasting covenant of priesthood” (second tablets did not have words of the covenant)
- So with JST changes, Deut says law did not have words of covenant, and Hebrews says law did not have oath
- D&C 84:25 God took Moses and priesthood out from them (=took words of covenant & no oath?)
- Similar to 1 Ne 13 – took plain and precious from gospel, even many covenants. Then took from book.
- D&C 132:19 – what is “it”? everlasting covenant (later in 19: as hath been sealed upon their heads)
- b/c everlasting covenant from JST Gen 14 = godhood, this makes sense.
- D&C 132:19 and JST Gen 14 both use principalities and powers
- D&C 84:42 “by mine own voice” also in JST Gen 14:29 and Hebrews (and Alma 13 – called)
- Oaths – Hebrews talks about Abraham’s oath, and Christ’s priesthood oath
- “confirm” talked about in Hebrews 7 and D&C 84:39-42
- D&C 132:59 by mine own voice Aaron Hebrews also says called of God
- back to covenants taken out: Covenant given to Adam etc, then missing until Abraham, then missing until Moses, then missing until Christ, then missing until Joseph Smith
- covenant is received, as we emphasized earlier. Given by God, oath made by God. Receive covenant, receive oath, over and over. Alma 13, God ordains. God calls. D&C 84:40, D&C 66: , D&C 132:27.
- Consequences come after that is clear D&C 132:27, D&C 84:41
- In 1831 office of high priest given, thought of as sealing lots of things, even sealing up to eternal life
- D&C 84 was in 1832 developed, but think context of sealing up to eternal life
- Joseph Smith’s later discourses, Moses’s people won’t accept last stage the gift of eternal life. Why did they reject? don’t know. D&C 84 says same thing didn’t want to enter God’s rest, see face to face. See discourses maybe March 1844
- Receive everlasting covenant, not obey everlasting covenant.
- Joseph Smith’s creativity with everything (laws on polygamy, etc.) may reflect his position of receiving this higher law and power, like Nephi (in Helaman), Enoch, etc. They had power to move rivers, mountains, create famines, etc.
- did Joseph’s confidence come from lost 116 pages? God has many ways of doing His work, He is wise, I can’t ruin it, in for the ride
Tag Archives: Hebrews 7
Yes, yes, a perpetual question of mine. I was doing research on Melchizedek again (b/c of my next Dews From Heaven post), and I remembered that the JST had some interesting details.
The JST for Hebrews 7 has these two verses about Melchizedek:
3 For this Melchizedek was ordained a priest after the order of the Son of God, which order was without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life. And all those who are ordained unto this priesthood are made like unto the Son of God, abiding a priest continually.
21 (For those priests were made without an oath; but this with an oath by him that said unto him, The Lord sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek;)
Does the “oath” or covenant have to do with the fact that this is forever? Is that the oath? That is will last, that the priest has become part of an order that never ends? It’s a good hypothesis, that of course needs much more time and attention. But I’ll try and keep that one in mind next time I work on D&C 84!