Tag Archives: YW Manual 3

YW Lesson 38 (Good Health Habits)


Well I was all excited to teach YW in another week, until I just saw what it is I’m teaching: Good Health Habits.  Yikes!

But the more I think about it, of course, the more comes to mind. The more I think about the way in which we know the soul is the body and the spirit. The body is fascinating, interesting, and even eternal, in its resurrected state.

And the work we do here in the church here on earth is with our physical body and our spirit. We are souls.

And we are working to save souls – people, spirits, presented to us in physical bodies.

I am a bit nervous about opening up a discussion on eating right, because it will too easily turn into discussions of dieting, organic, herbal, etc. All of that is interesting, but it’s hard to know what to teach in the classroom. I want to say, “Learn. Be smart. But I’m not going to tell you here if you should eat this or that brand of organic chicken.”

So, anyway, here are a few things I have found so far (I’ll add to this as I find more or have more thoughts). And of course I will check out the lesson post at Beginnings New and likely discuss the lesson there too. (Yep, see the post here – though make sure to read the comment, too.)

===================

A consecrated life is a life of labor. Beginning early in His life, Jesus was about His Father’s business (see Luke 2:48–49). God Himself is glorified by His work of bringing to pass the immortality and eternal life of His children (see Moses 1:39). We naturally desire to participate with Him in His work, and in so doing, we ought to recognize that all honest work is the work of God. In the words of Thomas Carlyle: “All true Work is sacred; in all true Work, were it but true hand-labour, there is something of divineness. Labour, wide as the Earth, has its summit in Heaven.” 3

God has designed this mortal existence to require nearly constant exertion. I recall the Prophet Joseph Smith’s simple statement: “By continuous labor [we] were enabled to get a comfortable maintenance” (Joseph Smith—History 1:55). By work we sustain and enrich life. It enables us to survive the disappointments and tragedies of the mortal experience. Hard-earned achievement brings a sense of self-worth. Work builds and refines character, creates beauty, and is the instrument of our service to one another and to God. A consecrated life is filled with work, sometimes repetitive, sometimes menial, sometimes unappreciated but always work that improves, orders, sustains, lifts, ministers, aspires.

Having spoken in praise of labor, I must also add a kind word for leisure. Just as honest toil gives rest its sweetness, wholesome recreation is the friend and steadying companion of work. Music, literature, art, dance, drama, athletics—all can provide entertainment to enrich one’s life and further consecrate it. At the same time, it hardly needs to be said that much of what passes for entertainment today is coarse, degrading, violent, mind-numbing, and time wasting. Ironically, it sometimes takes hard work to find wholesome leisure. When entertainment turns from virtue to vice, it becomes a destroyer of the consecrated life. “Wherefore, take heed … that ye do not judge that which is evil to be of God” (Moroni 7:14).

A consecrated life respects the incomparable gift of one’s physical body, a divine creation in the very image of God. A central purpose of the mortal experience is that each spirit should receive such a body and learn to exercise moral agency in a tabernacle of flesh. A physical body is also essential for exaltation, which comes only in the perfect combination of the physical and the spiritual, as we see in our beloved, resurrected Lord. In this fallen world, some lives will be painfully brief; some bodies will be malformed, broken, or barely adequate to maintain life; yet life will be long enough for each spirit, and each body will qualify for resurrection.

Those who believe that our bodies are nothing more than the result of evolutionary chance will feel no accountability to God or anyone else for what they do with or to their body. We who have a witness of the broader reality of premortal, mortal, and postmortal eternity, however, must acknowledge that we have a duty to God with respect to this crowning achievement of His physical creation. In Paul’s words:

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?

“For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s” (1 Corinthians 6:19–20).

Acknowledging these truths and the direction of President Thomas S. Monson in last April’s general conference, we would certainly not deface our body, as with tattoos; or debilitate it, as with drugs; or defile it, as with fornication, adultery, or immodesty. 4 As our body is the instrument of our spirit, it is vital that we care for it as best we can. We should consecrate its powers to serve and further the work of Christ. Said Paul, “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God” (Romans 12:1).

(This from “Reflections on a Consecrated Life” by D. Todd Christofferson in October 2010)

=======================================================

I also liked the talk “Sanctity of the Body” by Susan Tanner in October 2005:

What would happen if we truly treated our bodies as temples? The result would be a dramatic increase in chastity, modesty, observance of the Word of Wisdom, and a similar decrease in the problems of pornography and abuse, for we would regard the body, like the temple, as a sacred sanctuary of the Spirit. Just as no unclean thing may enter the temple, we would be vigilant to keep impurity of any sort from entering the temple of our bodies.

Likewise, we would keep the outside of our bodily temples looking clean and beautiful to reflect the sacred and holy nature of what is inside, just as the Church does with its temples. We should dress and act in ways that reflect the sacred spirit inside us.

In For the Strength of Youth it says: “Your body is God’s sacred creation. Respect it as a gift from God, and do not defile it in any way. Through your dress and appearance, you can show the Lord that you know how precious your body is. … The way you dress is a reflection of what you are on the inside” ([2001], 14–15).

Modesty is more than a matter of avoiding revealing attire. It describes not only the altitude of hemlines and necklines but the attitude of our hearts. The word modesty means “measured.” It is related to moderate. It implies “decency, and propriety … in thought, language, dress, and behavior” (in Daniel H. Ludlow, ed., Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 5 vols. [1992], 2:932).

Moderation and appropriateness should govern all of our physical desires. A loving Heavenly Father has given us physical beauties and pleasures “both to please the eye and to gladden the heart” (D&C 59:18), but with this caution: that they are “made to be used, with judgment, not to excess, neither by extortion” (D&C 59:20). My husband used this scripture to teach our children about the law of chastity. He said that the “wordextortion … literally means to ‘twist out [or against].’ Our use of … the body must not be twisted [against] the divinely ordained purposes for which [it was] given. Physical pleasure is good in its proper time and place, but even then it must not become our god” (John S. Tanner, “The Body as a Blessing,” Ensign, July 1993, 10).

The pleasures of the body can become an obsession for some; so too can the attention we give to our outward appearance. Sometimes there is a selfish excess of exercising, dieting, makeovers, and spending money on the latest fashions (see Alma 1:27).

I am troubled by the practice of extreme makeovers. Happiness comes from accepting the bodies we have been given as divine gifts and enhancing our natural attributes, not from remaking our bodies after the image of the world. The Lord wants us to be made over—but in His image, not in the image of the world, by receiving His image in our countenances (see Alma 5:14, 19).


Consecration


I did some work at BN thinking about consecration and its relationship to grace. Here’s the link if you’re interested:

http://beginningsnew.blogspot.com/2011/08/consecration-yw-manual-3-lesson-28.html

 

I mostly looked at Mosiah 2-4. I think there is something good in there though it probably needs to be reworked a bit.


More thoughts on priesthood (YW lesson 12, 13, 14)


First of all, if you found this by searching for  YW lesson help, I recommend reading:

http://beginningsnew.blogspot.com/2008/03/teaching-yw-about-priesthood.html

http://beginningsnew.blogspot.com/2011/03/yw-lessons-12-13-14-on-priesthood-what.html

and

http://forthestrengthofyouth.wordpress.com/2011/03/16/elder-perrys-interviews-on-the-priesthood-for-yw-lessons-12-13-and-14-on-the-priesthood/

and my own thoughts – but don’t hold me to any of it! 🙂 –

https://whatimthinkingabout.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/thoughts-on-women-and-the-priesthood-just-some-thoughts/

I want to just continue from my last post and get out some more thoughts.

So I’ve been thinking about what jeans said,

  • D&C 121:34-46 is one of the most important pieces of doctrinal writing about the priesthood. Attempts to use it to control, dominate, or gratify pride grieve the Spirit. It cannot be exercised except in humble righteousness. Although we often use the phrase “priesthood power,” it isn’t about power, but about blessing others. In the process of forgetting self and blessing others, the one exercising his priesthood is thereby blessed and sanctified, not aggrandized or lifted up above others.
  • It is false doctrine to teach that women are “naturally” or “essentially” more righteous than men and don’t need to hold the priesthood for that reason. This is a common folk belief among Mormons and comes across many, many pulpits, but it has no backing in scripture or truth. In my opinion it is a holdover from the Victorian era “pedestalism” and it is just as odious as its gendered counterpart of male superiority. One gender is not the superior or the inferior of the other.

I really think jeans is right on. I believe that any talk of one gender being superior is just foolishness. It is usually an excuse of some kind.

What really surprises me is the talk of many women that “if we only complain long enough, they’ll get over their male patriarchy and give women the priesthood too.” Whenever I see that kind of attitude I have a bundle of concerns and questions. Continue reading